beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly form the Plaintiff, and as to the Plaintiff’s KRW 100,000,000, Defendant Co., Ltd. from September 1, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
가. 주식회사 태안컴퍼니는 2015. 3. 4. 전자어음번호 C, 액면금 1억 원, 만기일 2015. 8. 4., 지급은행 한국외환은행 수유지점으로 된 전자어음 1매(이하 ‘이 사건 어음’이라고 한다)를 발행하였고, 이후 피고 주식회사 경동이엔씨(이하 ‘피고 경동이엔씨’라고 한다), 주식회사 굿펠라스, 농업회사법인 주식회사 해풍, 피고 A, 주식회사 굿펠라스, 피고 주식회사 서당아(이하 ‘피고 서당아’라고 한다), 피고 코리아리소스 주식회사(이하 ‘피고 코리아리소스’라고 한다), 주식회사 하이메탈, 주식회사 오성테크코리아, 피고 B, 원고, 피고 B, 주식회사 오성테크코리아, 주식회사 신한특수제강, D, 주식회사 에이스이십일에게 순차로 배서, 양도되었다.
B. On August 4, 2015, E.I.D. had presented payment proposal on August 4, 2015, which was the maturity date of the said bill, but was refused to pay without trade.
C. On July 11, 2016, the Seoul Northern District Court 2016Kadan11599 filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff and New Es&T Co., Ltd. (former Special Control Group), claiming payment of the said amount. On July 31, 2016, the Plaintiff and New Es&T Co., Ltd jointly rendered a decision of recommending settlement that KRW 100 million should be paid by August 31, 2016, and the decision of recommending settlement was finalized around that time.
On August 30, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 100 million to E.I.D. and recovered the said bill.
[Ground of recognition] Defendant A: A without dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including a branch number), the purport of the whole argument, and the purport of the whole argument, Dong-dong corporation, Dong-dong corporation, Korea branch office, B: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (by service by public notice) (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) (a) of the Civil Procedure Act
2. The issuance and endorsement of judgment bills in respect of the cause of the action are made.