Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 12, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Eunpyeong District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and on July 13, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s horizontal site source.

On August 13, 2019, at around 00:10, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle at the Dmarily while under the influence of alcohol 0.079% of alcohol content in the section of about 5km from around the C Hospital located in Pyeongtaek-si B to the roads near the old-si-ro 529.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act was a motor vehicle owner who actually operates and manages a DNA horse, and operated the said motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, inquiry reports;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose a sentence, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As stated in the facts constituting a crime of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant, who had two times of drinking driving skills, does not need to strictly punish the defendant by driving a vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance during the same kind of probation period. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, and the defendant does not have any criminal record other than the above criminal record, and the defendant and the defendant do not have any criminal record.