1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment is written or added as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(A) Each of the parties' arguments on the issues of the instant case do not differ from that of the first instance court, and the evidence additionally submitted in the first instance court contains evidence No. 15). 2. The following descriptions are added to the lower line of the first instance court’s five pages.

In relation to this case, the plaintiff asserts that "the plaintiff was informed by the above advertiser to the purport that "the plaintiff shall manage the advertiser recruited by the plaintiff at the status of his own events after the termination of the contract in this case (the role performed by the plaintiff before the termination of the contract in this case)". The plaintiff's evidence No. 9 states that "after January 31, 2015, the advertisement information will be changed to "the advertisement information will be changed to an agency" directly, and before January 31, 2015, the above statement will be changed to the agency company and the main time is applied for the change to the agency company." However, the meaning of the above statement is not to allow the advertiser to perform the business of his own advertising rather than through the advertising agency, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit, and it is clear that the defendant's right to the advertisement in this case's notice in this case is unreasonable as it proves that it is not possible to acknowledge the right to the subsequent procedure of 15th or 15th of the first instance judgment as evidence."

Furthermore, an advertising agency is held.