The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant had a mental and physical weak condition under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

B. The sentencing of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (15 years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mental and physical weakness, the Defendant appears to have been suffering from drinking for a long time. From January 2013, the Defendant had been treated as a eromatic eromatic eromatic erode, the dependence on alcohol use, and other stimulative disorder due to excessive alcohol use. The Defendant dices alcohol together with the victim from the day before he committed the crime of murder in this case, and even before committing the crime of murder in this case, he can be acknowledged that the Defendant had a significant quantity of alcohol drinking with the victim, and the Defendant is in a state of interference with alcohol use.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant, which can be recognized by the above evidence, was booming the victim prior to the commission of the murder of this case; (b) the process leading up to the Defendant’s collection; (c) the Defendant’s behavior prior to the commission of the murder of this case; (d) the method of committing the murder of this case; (c) the circumstances after the commission of the murder of this case; and (d) the Defendant was in a state of interference with the current alcohol use; and (e) the Defendant’s mental response to the Defendant’s mental appraisal that was determined not to change things at the time of the commission of the murder of this case; (e) the Defendant

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. The sentencing of a judgment on an unfair assertion of sentencing is based on statutory penalty, and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are equally considered within the reasonable and appropriate scope.