logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2014.08.29 2014노259
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(절도강간등)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고 사건에 관하여 ⑴ 사실오인 및 법리오해 ㈎ 피고인이 피해자의 지갑을 열어 현금 2만 원이 들어 있는 것을 확인한 후 이를 집어 들고 추가로 절취할 물건을 찾아보기 위해 이동한 이상 이미 위 지갑은 피고인의 실력적 지배하에 옮겨졌다

Since theft crime was committed, it was consummated.

㈏ 이 사건 공소사실 중 강도상해의 점에 관하여, 피고인이 야구방망이를 피해자를 향해 휘두른 행위와 피해자의 다리를 깨문 행위는 절도범이 체포를 면탈하기 위한 행위이고 이는 상대방의 반항을 억압할 정도의 폭행협박에 해당하므로 준강도죄가 성립함에도 이 부분 공소사실을 무죄로 판단한 원심판결에는 사실오인 내지 법리오해의 위법이 있다.

D. The sentencing of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (three years of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs, and 5 years of order of disclosure notification) is too uneasible and unfair.

B. With respect to a case for which an attachment order is requested, the lower court erred by dismissing the person for whom the attachment order was requested, despite the need for the attachment of an electronic device to prevent the second offense, in light of the person’s history, etc.

2. Determination on the part of the defendant's case

A. (i) On January 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:15, the summary of the facts charged in this part of the facts charged: (b) at the victim’s room located in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Seoul (the 22 years old) located in the victim’s house; (c) took a theft of 150,000 won of a wall owned by the victim, which was located in cash in the victim’s seat; and (d) the Defendant was able to write off the door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door to the victim for the purpose of evading arrest; and (d) the father and the father of the victim who was divingd in the ward.

arrow