logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.12.21 2017고정787
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall drive a string car frequently or frequently.

On May 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 08:31, and driven the two-lane way in front of the D in Asan City C, Asan City, along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the high school located from the shooting distance room of the tourist hotel.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to stop immediately in case of discovery of pedestrians who walk the crosswalk, and the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to stop immediately in case of discovery of pedestrians.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and did not avoid the victim E ( South, 15 years old) who was standing a crosswalk to the right side of the left side of the opposite side of the marina course by negligence, and had the victim go beyond the road with the front part of the said car.

In this accident, the victim suffered injuries, such as cutting the frameworks of the left-hand side in need of approximately five weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A fact-finding survey report and field map, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and photographs of the scene of the accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Crime, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing of the instant crime; (b) the degree of the Defendant’s breach of duty of care; (c) the degree of the victim’s injured; and (d) the recovery of damage in part or by a comprehensive insurance in which the Defendant was admitted; and (c) the Defendant

arrow