1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for prohibition against the use of the mark on the “a, etc. liquid sheet products” and the amount of the mark, such as “,” etc.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

3. On the part of the lawsuit in this case's dismissal ex officio, the part concerning the claim for prohibition of the use of the mark ", etc.," the manufacturing, sale, transfer, distribution, advertisement, display, export, and import ban of ", etc.," the part concerning the claim for prohibition of the use of the mark, and the part concerning the claim for the destruction of the finished product, semi-finished products, packing paper, packing paper, packing paper, packing paper, fixed price list, guarantee certificate, and advertising materials of this case's lawsuit in this case's

In light of the above legal principles, “such as the prohibition of use, transfer, advertisement, display, export and import,” if a judgment is rendered with the same content as the purport of the claim sought by the Plaintiff, it is difficult to regard it as having the specific nature of the text of the judgment, and as an enforcement body is also unable to properly execute the judgment.

Therefore, among the lawsuit in this case, the part of the claim for prohibition of the use of the mark ", etc.," the manufacturing, sale, transfer, distribution, advertisement, display, export, and import ban of ", etc.," the finished product of ", etc., half-finished products, packing paper, packing paper, packing paper, packing paper, packing paper, guarantee sheet, and advertising materials" are unlawful, since the claim for prohibition of the use of the mark is not specified.