Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 11:50 on May 9, 2015, the Defendant insulting the victim in the vicinity of the E underground parking lot located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, such as: (a) discovered the Defendant who is under the influence of alcohol by the victim, the victim and the G, etc. belonging to the Gyeyang Police Station in the Gyeyang-gu, and asked the Defendant’s personal information, etc. for the prevention of accidents; and (b) deemed that the Defendant was a citizen who was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant’s insultd the victim by “the Defendant was brupted by the police officer of this e-mail; (c) whether the police officer of the Republic of Korea was erroneous; (d) whether the internal police officer of this e-mail was the police officer; and (e) whether the internal police officer of this e-mail was erroneous in the reality of the Republic of Korea; and (e) so-called, that the police officer should be aware of, and that the internal police officer should be badly flut.”
2. The Defendant, at the above time and place, committed an indecent act by compulsion, by force, committed an indecent act by force against the victim G (the 46-year-old) by stating that “I am hye, I am hye, one face, and one face,” and that I am on the victim’s chest by hand.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of G and H;
1. Determination as to the defense counsel’s assertion of the police statement concerning G
1. In light of the summary of the argument, the investigation report (the data on video recording of the H mobile phone cell phone police officer police officer) states that “I, at the beginning of 57 minutes, she was confirmed by the victim’s chest direction that I want to dn't dn't dn't dn't dn't dn't dn't h't h't h't h't h't h't h't h't h't h't h's chest towards the victim’s chest.”
2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and investigated by this court, it is reasonable to view that the time when the victim tolds as above is when the defendant attempted to catch the victim before the victim arrives, and the victim was injured. Thus, this is different.