logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.04.05 2015가단27739
공사대금
Text

1. Defendant LFC Co., Ltd. and Defendant A: (a) KRW 41,300,000 for each of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015.

Reasons

1. On April 25, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with D and D with respect to the instant construction work for the interior of C points (hereinafter “instant construction work”), and thereafter D paid 6.5 million won.

Since April 25, 2015 to June 3, 2015, D 113,000,000 won until April 30, 2015, and D 113,000,000 won was not paid until July 30, 2015. As to the instant construction, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant LFC (hereinafter “Defendant”) as follows (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on June 5, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) with Defendant LFC until June 3, 2005, and the Plaintiff received KRW 6,00,000 from Defendant A until June 26, 2016, the payment of the construction cost and the remainder of the construction period, and the payment from Defendant A 00,000 won until April 26, 2015:

The construction period, the down payment and the remainder of the payment date, from April 29, 2015 to July 5, 2015, KRW 168,30,000,000,000 on April 29, 2015, KRW 3 million; KRW 3 million on July 3, 2015; and KRW 23,30,000,000 on July 30, 2015, the Plaintiff received a written confirmation of the completion of the instant construction from Defendant A on July 14, 2015.

On the other hand, the defendant B entered into a franchise agreement with the defendant company on June 2015.

【Ground for Recognition: Each entry of evidence of 1 to 11】

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant company is obligated to pay the remainder of the construction of this case under the contract concluded on June 5, 2015, and the defendant A is obligated to pay the remainder of the construction of this case under the contract concluded on June 29, 2015.

Although Defendant A is not a party to the contract of the instant construction project, it is alleged that the instant construction project is not a party to the contract.

arrow