The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. On November 24, 2012, around 04:16, the Defendant: (a) entered the E Convenience store located in Jeju-si; (b) on the part of an employee victim F (n, 58 years old); (c) was able to take property by entering the convenience store; and (d) was able to take property by taking the mar and make face; and (c) was flicked on the right side of the mar, following the mar and make, and entered the convenience store.

The Defendant continued to set 1 cans and coffees which were in the cooling place above the above convenience point calculation unit as if the Defendant calculated the franchising, and franchising the franchis in advance possessed by the victim, and franchising the 3-4 parts of the franchis and left side side of the victim, and tried to force the victim to take money after suppressing the victim’s resistance, but she did not go through the wind to resist the victim’s resistance.

As a result, the defendant strongly withdrawn the victim's property, and the defendant laid down the victim's property to the attempted crime, and put about a simple heat on the left side which requires treatment for about one week.

B. The lower court rendered a judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the following grounds.

1) As a result of fingerprinting that the Defendant’s prosecutorial statement as evidence consistent with or consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, each of the statements made by the victim’s investigative agency and court of the lower court at the scene of the crime was found, and such fingerprints is the Defendant, there are CCTV photographic images taken on the scene of the instant crime, photographic pictures with a stone with a stone with a view to committing the crime, a diagnosis document on the victim, and a fact-finding appraisal document with a view to measuring the Defendant’s eyesight. 2) Examining these evidence first of all, the Defendant’s prosecutorial statement as a whole is irrelevant to memory on specific matters related to the facts charged, such as the circumstances and method of the instant crime, but the CCTV photographic image