logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.21 2017누81467
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reason why this part of the disposition is used by the court is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The grounds for use of this part of the disposition in this case are as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance is acceptable.

[1] The part used in the judgment of the court of first instance is added as follows: d) The fact-finding results with respect to the head of the Seoul Hospital at Macheon National University (Smoking) (1) on November 3, 2015. Because there is pneumoconiosis, it is judged that there is no plesy from the prosecutor of January 4, 2016. (2) The tension and plesying fright, including the heart, are fast and plesyed on the left side, and the following parts are added. (3) The plesying function of the head of the court of first instance, Macheon National University, Seoul National University (hereinafter referred to as “Secheon National University”). Although the head of the main institution in the case of the deceased, the head of the institution is extremely sealed, and there is no change in the location of the heart, and the head of the institution is no longer than 150 plesy plesy, and thus, it is considered that there is no other 15 plesying condition.

arrow