All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the defendant's case, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is pronounced.

Defendant

In this case where a person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") has been sentenced to more minor punishment, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. In light of the Defendant’s age, character and environment, motive and consequence of each of the instant crimes, as well as various circumstances indicated in the records, with respect to a request to attach an attachment order, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, has the risk of recidivism of a sexual crime against the Defendant.

It is reasonable to maintain the judgment of the first instance that ordered the attachment of an electronic tracking device for a period of seven years.

There is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.