1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On April 22, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years and 6 months in Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., on May 15, 2008; two years and 6 months in imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's interest support; and three years in imprisonment with prison labor for a quasi robbery at the Jung District Court on December 9, 201.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 From January 26, 2015 to 11:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of the victim’s property on the part of the victim, who was not locked with the lock set up in the Defendant’s house AV set up in Gangseo Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Seoul; (b) on the part of the victim’s market price at an amount equivalent to KRW 1.20,00,000, and was habitually

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer against AW (Simplified larceny);

1. Seizure records, etc. (the fact that a bicycle has been seized);

1. Investigation report (the details of attachment of a photograph of the AW and a Z bicycle witness);

1. Report on internal investigation (aV analysis of CCTV around the place where the crime is committed and attachment of the suspect's appearance), (aV thief site and place where CCTV is installed), (aV thief site), (a bicycle detection out of the AV thief site), and [a field photograph (aV or AX suspect's detection of bicycles on board)];

1. CCTV-cap photographs (in the form of moving a bicycle by the defendant), case-related photographs (report on attachment of photographs, such as non-performance of a bicycle and a place where discovery is discovered);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, and inquiry records;

1. Habituality of the judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the fact that each criminal record and the defendant were confined to the same or a similar crime and repeatedly committed the crime of this case within the short time after being released from the court;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Legal penalty: A fine not exceeding 15 million won;

2. Recommendation type on the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not be considered, since they have been selected by a fine.

3. Sentence: fine of two million won; and