Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 2, 2016, around 22:10, the Defendant 191-36 new apartment complexes in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 191-36, including Dong C, and the victim D(53) and E expressed that the Defendant gets on and off the road that the Defendant gets on and off the bicycle, and that the injured party gets her desire to attract the bicycle, and that the Defendant her will to her will to see why she would her will to her will, the victim her body, her body, her body, and the victim her body, she her head, her head, and her son her head son.
Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim, such as the victim's wheels to face his/her finger face, against the victim's act.
Summary of Evidence
1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;
1. Application of DNA Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;
1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The judgment and defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the defendant is the first offender, and the background of the case, degree of violence, age of the defendant, etc.) of the suspended sentence (the defendant is the first offender, and the circumstances of the crime, degree of violence, age of the defendant, etc.) of the Criminal Act, asserts that the act identical to the criminal facts of the defendant constitutes a passive defense to protect the defendant's life
The defendant's act is to defend an improper attack, even though the victim is deemed to have first exercised his violence, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence at the time of the crime of this case.