A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol on May 1, 2014, posted the entrance door to the victim C, who was in front of the residence of the victim C, who was in the Gyeong-gun, and was unable to know of the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

Therefore, the victim demanded the defendant to leave over several times, but the defendant has been living in the above residence for about 37 minutes while disregarding this.

Accordingly, the defendant leaves the victim.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the same time and place as set forth in the above Paragraph (1) above, was shot H belonging to the G police station that was sent to the scene after receiving a report from the victim D, and was shot H and a security guard I on several occasions, and was expelled from the said place of residence at the same time, and damaged the entrance of 500,000 won at the market price of the next victim’s possession by walking the front door at one time.

3. At around 03:20 on the same day as the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant was unable to have avoided disturbance by leaving his residence without returning home continuously after leaving his residence as above paragraph (2). Accordingly, on the ground that the above slope H (the age of 42) who is the victim was authorized to return home on several occasions, the Defendant expressed that “I her name was changed to her address, her name was changed to her name, her opening, her smoking, and she she was cut to her drinking.” On two occasions at the left end of the above slope H’s drinking, the Defendant she saw the above slope she was slided by the left side of the said slope H, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers for the maintenance of public order and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the corresponding Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 257 of the Criminal Act