logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.09 2016고단2935
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) was related to traffic accidents that occurred between the Defendant and B from the long distance of 462 U.S. at the center of Ansan-si, a member of the National Police Station of Ansan-si, and (b) was aware of the circumstances of the accident and explanation by the victim C about the accident handling; (c) the victim did not have his/her horse easily; and (d) the victim attempted to give evidence with his/her cellular phone; and (d) caused the damage to his/her cellular phone by destroying his/her cell phone by destroying the victim’s cell phone, which is citing his/her cell phone with his/her mobile phone.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the LG G4 mobile phone owned by the victim so that the repair cost of the amount can be avoided.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place of the above paragraph (1) above, experienced questions about the circumstances of the accident from the border of the police station of the Nansan National Police Agency C and the Gyeonggi Local Police Agency D, who had been engaged in traffic control in relation to the traffic accidents that occurred between himself/herself and B, and was insulting to the above C as stated in the above paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the above C attempted to photograph the Defendant’s insulting act using a mobile phone, the Defendant “drawing,” and the Defendant scamed with the body of C by hand and knicked with the cell phone by hand. Then, the above E attempted to take the body of E in his hand, and then cut off the chest of E two times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers in dealing with traffic accidents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow