The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime and divided wrong facts, and it seems that he did not benefit from the crime.

There is no record of criminal punishment since 1985, and there is no record of elderly health, and there is a place where economic difficulty is difficult.

However, since the transfer of the means of access for electronic financial transactions may impair the safety and reliability of electronic financial transactions and be used as a means of other crimes, it is necessary to strictly punish them, and the means of access for electronic financial transactions transferred by the defendant was actually used for fraud.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relation, etc. as well as various conditions of sentencing indicated in the arguments and records, it cannot be deemed that the court below's punishment is too heavy beyond the reasonable limit of discretion.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.