The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was erroneous in the lower judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, even though the Defendant did not violate the signal as stated in the facts charged.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the signal, etc. in the direction of the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle entered the red signal and the signal, etc. in the direction of the vehicle of the victim entered the red signal and the signal, etc. in the direction of the vehicle of the victim is a place where the right-hand left-hand left-hand turn can be left-hand after the right-hand signal. The time when the accident of this case occurred, when the vehicle signal, etc. of the defendant's vehicle was red, and 2.2 seconds after the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second, and when considering the yellow signal 3 seconds, it is recognized that the

Considering the distance from the vehicle stop line to the point where the accident occurred, the speed of the vehicle of the defendant, etc. in the above recognition, it is reasonable to deem that the vehicle of the defendant passed the stop line at the time of changing it to red signal to yellow signal.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.