Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
[Claim]
Reasons
1. The reasoning of this court's judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Paragraph 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following "2. height", and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of
2. We delete the end of the third judgment of the first instance, which is in turn, from the end of the third judgment to the end of the fourth to the end of the fourth reduction.
The fourth to fourth parallels in the judgment of the first instance are as follows.
The Defendant asserted that the extinctive prescription of the instant secured claim of the instant secured claim of the instant secured claim was suspended since J obtained dividends from June 7, 2002 to 3 and 4 times a year from the auction of the real estate auction case of military branch of the Jeonju District Court YY P, which is the joint collateral of the instant secured claim of the instant secured claim of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the security of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the lease of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the lease of the right of the right of the right of the right of the lease of the right of the right of the right.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.