1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s wife, H, and Plaintiff I (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) shared the share of F Miscellaneous land F 1,460 square meters, G miscellaneous land 3,685 square meters, L Miscellaneous land 641 square meters, and 608.83 square meters of the above K’s prefabricated-type office building (hereinafter “instant prefabricated-type building”) in the proportion of shares of 1,765.33/296, H 1,765/296, and 1,765.34/296, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as "land number shall be specified only). (b)

1) On October 6, 2010, the Plaintiff et al. concluded the instant sales contract and the instant special agreement (i.e., the trade name before the amendment: J Co., Ltd. and Qgu Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”).

A) A real estate sales contract for the purpose of selling the F-owned building of KRW 1,026 square meters among F-owned land, KRW 2,556 square meters among K-owned land, and KRW 1.6 billion among the instant combined buildings (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and the said subject matter of sale is “land and buildings subject to the instant sales”.

A) The Defendant Company concluded a contract. The Defendant Company paid KRW 250 million out of the remainder on the date of the contract to the Plaintiff not later than March 31, 2012, and the notary public prepared and executed a notarial deed as to the obligation to pay the balance under the 2011 deed No. 93, which was 2010, the 201. The Defendant Company’s representative director, the Defendant D, and Defendant E (hereinafter “B money Defendants”) as the wife of Defendant C and Defendant C (hereinafter “the Defendants”).

(2) The Plaintiff, etc. and the Defendant Company jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation to pay the remainder of KRW 250 million. (2) The total sum of the parts excluded from the instant sales contract from F and K land at the time of the instant sales contract, and each of the above land is subject to the instant special agreement.

Although the Defendants asserted that the land subject to the instant special agreement does not include LB land, it is apparent that the land subject to the instant special agreement contains LB land.