logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.10.10 2018고단2044
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on November 30, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 30, 2017.

The Defendant was the head of Gangnam-gu “C” private teaching institute located in Gangnam-gu Seoul.

At the end of December 2014, the Defendant stated that “Around the end of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant shall enter a medical college with his or her share of the essay points at the time of the examination for the admission of each medical college at E.E. campus, F.F. G., and H. H. university.” The Defendant may raise the points of the essay to the personnel in charge of the admission of each university on the pretext of the personnel expenses of KRW 30 million. As such, the Defendant may give his or her father’s admission to the medical college. If he or she does not enter, he or she would return the money later than two weeks.”

However, the defendant was not aware of the person in charge of the admission to the above university, and the person in charge of the admission did not have an intent and ability to pass the examination by manipulating the points of the victim's father with the pretext of a request for admission to the medical school.

Nevertheless, on January 30, 2015, the Defendant received a false statement from the victim, and acquired 90 million won from the J bank account (K) in the name of Defendant wife I on January 30, 2015.

Around November 10, 2015, the Defendant stated that “Around Gyeyang-gu L, the victim M was nearest to the foundation and heading of the N High School. The Defendant recommended the N High School sports teacher in the N High School. As the N High School’s place was unfolded, the Defendant made a false proposal to the effect that the victim’s children will be employed as N High School sports teacher.”

However, the defendant did not know about the foundation of the above high school, and the above high school did not have a screening to employ teachers with donations or recommendations, and the above high school sports teachers from the victim.

arrow