Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B character car.

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car on May 10, 2010, and continued to proceed from the distance of tin service to the distance of tin service at the front and the intersection of the Tae-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Since there is a remote distance in which signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a vehicle that is being driven by reducing speed and checking the side well, and to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part on the right side of the E-to-land driving by the victim D (year 41) who was straight along the course signal from the left side of the running direction to the right side of the running signal while driving the vehicle signal, as the front part of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 7th anniversary of the left-hand side in need of approximately 10 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence, such as the alley, the right-hand pelle, and the pelle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident and field photographs;

1. Investigation report (victim D telephone communications);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of CD image Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the degree of damage to a traffic accident caused by a violation of signalling the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not be light, considering the fact that the defendant did not have any criminal record, and that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, etc.