All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of thirty thousand won.

The defendant above.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact-finding, misunderstanding of legal principles, etc., 1) 2016 No. 4038 (Embezzlement of Lost Articles in Possession) Defendant’s possession does not constitute the goods owned by the victim as the goods of the Defendant, the lower court convicted this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2) Although the Defendant was not obligated to pay wages equivalent to the period during which Q did not actually work, the lower court convicted of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on facts.

3) Although there was no purpose of slandering the Defendant, and there was no perception that it was false because the Defendant was aware that the content of sending e-mail was the content of the sending, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on facts.

4) Defendant 2017No. 475 (Case of Invalidity of Official Marks) did not damage the notice, and Defendant did not constitute a crime of invalidation of official labeling, but the lower court convicted Defendant of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine or misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The sentencing of each of the judgment below 2, 3, and 4 is too inappropriate.

2. Determination

A. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

The first, second, and third court rendered a judgment against the defendant after completing a separate hearing with the Gwangju District Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 214 High Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 130 High Court 130 High Court 201 High Court 331 High Court , and the defendant filed each appeal against the judgment below 1,2, and 3 High Court 201 High Court 1 High Court 1,2, and 3 Supreme Court 201 High Court 1 High Court 38(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.