Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 2,00,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants and C are siblings and siblings.

The Defendants, together with C, at the “E” real estate office located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu around December 21, 2016, at around 17:10 on December 21, 2016, Defendant A and the F and the winding family of Defendant A run the said real estate.

The assertion of the disturbance was made by the victim G (the 52 years old), who was employed as an employee of the said F, due to the fact that the plaintiff was suffering from disturbance, the plaintiff was suffering from the disturbance, and the plaintiff was suffering from the business of this office, and the defendant was living outside the above office, and the defendant A was faced with the victim's head by drinking, the defendant B who participated in it was frightening the victim's eye by drinking, and the defendant B was frighted with the victim's face by assaulting the victim with the face of the victim by assaulting the victim for about 8 weeks in the face of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants, together with C, injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of statutes to inquiries into the facts to the Defendants and the heads of I Hospital, in the 5th public trial protocol in which the witness G’s partial statement of the Defendants in the 4th public trial protocol in each part of the Defendants in the 3th public trial protocol, are written in the witness H’s statement in the 5th public trial protocol with respect to G of the police interrogation protocol in each police suspect interrogation protocol with respect to the Defendants and C.

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 2 of the same Act concerning the selection of a punishment, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The reasoning for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not recognize each of the instant offenses, and the Defendants did not recover from damage until the date of the sentencing order, under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendants, the instant crime was committed in the course of committing assault between the Defendants and the victim, and the degree of injury to the victim is the degree of injury.