logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.08.10 2018고단920
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the Victim B worked together with the “D” restaurant employees in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, and ASEAN.

The facts were that the Defendant did not have any child to pay money, and that he did not have a diplomatic official, and that he did not married in the United States, and that he did not have any marriage in the United States, and not only did the Defendant have to pay the existing debt to the bond business operator who borrowed money from the injured party.

On September 13, 2012, the Defendant, at the above restaurant around September 13, 2012, “40 million won is leased, and the Defendant shall pay back immediately.

“A false statement,” which received KRW 4 million from the injured party, as well as KRW 58,50,000,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (E) in cash or in cash, and acquired it by defrauding the total amount of KRW 58,50,000 through 20 times, such as the one copy of the List of Crimes 1.

The Defendant and the Victim F, “H restaurant” in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, would work together with the “H restaurant.”

On July 30, 2014, the Defendant requires operational funds to operate the Paris Embrypt in the above restaurant around 09:14.

“.....”

However, the facts were that the defendant's female did not operate Paris Bar, and the defendant thought that he would receive money from the injured party to pay his debt.

The Defendant, as above, was delivered KRW 5 million to the Agricultural Cooperative account (E) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the victim for the same day from the victim, and received KRW 24 million in total in cash or in the said account by the Defendant for the same period from around that time to November 15, 2014, as shown in attached Table 2 of the crime committed during the period from around that time (i.e., the correction to October 18, 2014 as the date of Nos. 9 of the [Attachment 9] to “ October 19, 2014”).

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 920"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol B of the police statement with regard to B

arrow