logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.10.26 2016재다2183
손해배상(기)
Text

The request for retrial is dismissed.

The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

Whether there are any grounds for retrial or not.

As the grounds of appeal against the judgment of the second instance, which is a small claim, was dismissed on the ground that the grounds of appeal do not fall under any of the subparagraphs of Article 3 of the Trial of Small Claims Act, the judgment subject to a retrial contains a judgment that the allegation in the grounds of appeal does not constitute the above grounds, it cannot be deemed that the judgment

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Ja181 Decided October 7, 2005). Therefore, there is no ground for retrial under Article 451(1)9 of the Civil Procedure Act in the instant judgment subject to a retrial.

Therefore, the retrial costs are dismissed, and the costs of retrial are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow