A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while working as a marin in the mutual amusement station of “G” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, was well aware that he was a marine.

He appeared and testified as a witness of the defense counsel with respect to the case that he raped his employee I in the room of the above entertainment point, and he was able to make a statement favorable to H.

1. In the first instance trial on January 14, 2014, the Defendant testified to the effect that, at around 16:00, the court of the Seoul Central District Court, 418, the Defendant was present at the court of the Seoul Central District Court, 2013 high Gohap 1169, as a witness of the instant case, including rape with H, etc., and that, at the same time, the Defendant was talking about two persons when she went through studio, and that the complainant was able to put 50,000 won volume of 50,000 won into the main machine.

However, at the time, I was suffering from the sourceless satis, and there was no fact that H did not pay the money.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

2. In the second instance trial on August 8, 2014, the Defendant was present at the prosecutor’s office of the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court Decision 312) to investigate perjury-related facts at the prosecutor’s office of the Seoul High Public Prosecutor’s Office (Seoul High Court Decision 2014No. 1204).

7.(24) No later than 24. The phone call was sent to him, resulting in a sudden fall-off of the system, which was delayed due to the scheduled date of attendance, and the phone was lost and omitted, and was not a telephone call.

Before being present as a witness, there was no telephone from H's defense counsel, and there was no telephone number.

In relation to this testimony, there is no fact that the testimony was received or made at the request of the defendant, such as H H's punishmentJ, etc.

H did not have a large number of witnesses.

There is no fact that there was a request for testimony or testimony.

The testimony was made to the effect that “.........”

(b).