The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant may have a criminal record of the same kind, and even though the Defendant did not agree with the victim during the suspended execution period due to the same kind of crime, it is contrary to the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, and taking into account the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, occupation, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all the sentencing factors indicated in the theory of changes, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the judgment of the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the Prosecutor is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.