logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.06.12 2013고단342
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: A, an employee of the defendant, violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority in operating B vehicles at the front of the inspection station of the side 15.3km km of the side 15.3km of the side fl3km of the side flick line, around January 26, 1994, in relation to the defendant's business.

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of March 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of January 5, 1995), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has lost its effect due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality on December 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The Institute of Jind Co., Ltd.

arrow