logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.08.28 2019고단5147
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On June 17, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 17, 202 and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 25th

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 9, 2019, around 02:00, the Defendant committed as if the Defendant were to pay the amount, even if having received alcoholic beverages, etc. from the “D” adult hall operator of the victim C operated in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., the Defendant received alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 150,000,000 at the market price of the victim, such as 18 bottles, etc.

2. At the same time and place as above, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as demanding payment of the drinking value by the victim C, demanding the victim C to pay the drinking value, and taking the victim’s bath, and pressing the clobbbing, which was set on the floor.

3. On the same day at around 02:38 of the foregoing day, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the details of the report by police officers F belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station E District E District of the Ulsannam Police Station, who called “I will not grant any alcohol value;” and (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s 112 report handling duties on his/her 112 report on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant: (b) carried out the foregoing F’s head and chest parts by hand; (c) cut back the head and chest parts of the said F’s bridge parts by hand; and (d) cut back the F’s bridge parts by hand; and (e) interfered with the police officer’s 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. A H statement;

1. A list of 112 reported cases, photographs, photographs (on-site receipts, and damaged parts);

1. Written replies to the order to submit a report;

1. Previous Records: Criminal history records and other inquiries, and the Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2020 High Order 2020 High Order 680 Decided Defendant and defense counsel held that the credit card at the time of fraud (I card was possessed, but the credit card was restricted in settlement at entertainment establishments.

arrow