Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

On March 20, 2017, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving the freight truck of D4.5 tons, was driving the above freight vehicle around 11:06 on March 20, 2017, and was driving on the three-lane road near the signal lights No. 13 in the old port north-ro in the city of Changwon, along the two-lanes on the surface of the new port container wharf at the port of Busan.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed on the front side, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the new code.

In doing so, the Defendant neglected this and received a part of the Fump truck’s Fump truck’s front side of the victim E (60) driving, which was proceeding in accordance with the new code from the right side of the proceeding direction to the left side by negligence in violation of the stop signal.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the dives of the following legs, which requires about 16 weeks of medical treatment, due to these occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. CCTV image data;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and opinions;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the Defendant was able to repent and reflect his mistake in depth, and that the Defendant agreed to do so with the victim, as well as the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence, environment, criminal record, etc., and the conditions for various kinds of sentencing as shown in the arguments and arguments, were determined as ordered.