1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiffs the respective corresponding money and each of the above money by the Plaintiff stated in the attached Table 2’s Schedule.

1. Details of ruling;

A. The head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the authorization for project implementation on August 16, 2013 regarding “A Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project” implemented by the Defendant pursuant to Article 28 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (Amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017)

(Song-gu Public Notice B). (b)

The Defendant filed an application for adjudication with the C Committee in order to acquire each relevant land indicated in the “land to be expropriated” column in attached Table 2, which is owned by the Plaintiffs necessary for the said rearrangement project (hereinafter “land to be expropriated”).

On December 23, 2016, the C Committee decided the starting date of expropriation as of February 10, 2017 with respect to the land to be expropriated in this case and rendered a ruling of expropriation.

C. The Plaintiffs filed an objection against the above adjudication of expropriation. On November 23, 2017, the Central Land Tribunal rendered a ruling to change the amount of compensation for losses incurred by the Defendant’s acquisition of the instant land subject to expropriation into the amount indicated in the “price” column in attached Table 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant objection”). [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' compensation for losses under the adjudication on the objection of this case is below the market price of the land to be expropriated, and the compensation for losses and due compensation for losses arising from the court's appraisal results are sought.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that compensation for losses under the instant objection ruling is reasonable price.

3. Determination

A. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation, each appraisal and court appraiser, which form the basis for the ruling, are different opinions in consideration of the factors of the price assessment except for the comparison of goods and others, since there is no illegality in the assessment methods.