logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.11 2016가단547
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 700,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from January 21, 2016 to August 11, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From August 1, 2014 to the 5th day of the same month, the Plaintiff purchased such households as be used by Defendant B from Defendant B, from Defendant B, and from Defendant B’s house located under Defendant B’s 106-dong 101, as well as from Defendant B’s house located under Defendant B’s Cheongju-si E located under the territory of Cheongju-si located under the jurisdiction of Defendant B, as well as from Defendant C’s Dong-gu’s Dong Dong-gu’s Dong Dong-gu’s Dong Dong-gu’s Dong Dong-gu’s 203 Dong 2004, the Plaintiff purchased the instant household from Defendant C’s Dong-gu’s Dong-gu dong-gu 203 Dong 2004, and purchased the instant household from Defendant C’s Dong-gu 200,000 won (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant household”). The sales contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendants included the instant household in the total of KRW 1.5 million (hereinafter referred to as “the instant sales contract”).

On the other hand, the bedboard that the plaintiff agreed to purchase was not located in the office of the defendant B, but the delivery interval was also ordered, and the defendant B delivered the bedboard frame in the house.

B. After the delivery of the instant household, the Plaintiff demanded return of goods to Defendant B, stating that the condition of goods is not good, and the Defendant B, around December 4, 2014, agreed between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, that the Plaintiff returned the instant household to Defendant B, and that Defendant B pay KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff. Defendant B paid KRW 2 million to the Plaintiff on May 1, 2015.

C. On the other hand, around February 10, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants as fraud. On June 17, 2015, the prosecution rendered a non-prosecution disposition against the Defendants on the charge of having been suspected.

Accordingly, on December 10, 2015, the prosecution appealed against the plaintiff, and on December 10, 2015, the defendant B "the defendant sold an empty household, etc." on August 2014.

arrow