1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows, and the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as those for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the new argument by this court. As such, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

The part 6th parallel 6th parallel 6th parallel 6th parallel 6th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 6th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 2017Ma6073 against E., but the Supreme Court dismissed the reappeal on June 8, 2018."

Note 7-2-5 (based on recognition) add “B-2” to the column.

Part 8, "Evidence 3 through 11, 17, 20 through 22 of A" shall be deemed to be "Evidence 3 through 11, 17, 20 through 22, and 30 of A".

Sub-section 14.00

3.2

3 Only by the facts recognized in paragraph 3

3.2

3. The facts acknowledged in paragraph 3 and the evidence submitted additionally by the plaintiffs at the party trial alone are determined as follows: “The issue of whether the Dong zone is a section for exclusive use shall be determined according to the content of the I’s sectional act; thereafter, whether the Dong zone is a section for exclusive use shall be determined according to the content of the I’s sectional act objectively indicated by the intention of classification at the time of establishment of sectional ownership; and otherwise, it shall be determined according to the content of the I’s subjective design intent or sectional act of a certified architect who prepared a design drawing.”

B. In addition, the Plaintiffs were the common areas of the building of this case for which the Dong area was originally determined.

Even if the former owner of F did not raise any objection from other residents, he asserts that the Dong area of this case was changed to that of exclusive ownership by exclusively occupying and using the Dong area of this case for at least ten years.

In order to change the section for common use of a sectional ownership into the section for exclusive use, the part of the building is structurally or used.