beta
Text
1. On May 16, 2014, the Plaintiff’s Defendants amount to KRW 4,00,000 under a monetary loan agreement and around July 25, 2014.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 16, 2014, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 4 million from May 16, 2014 to the Defendants, who run “EDag” in Gwangju, the Plaintiff drafted a certificate of money borrowed from the Plaintiff, and thereafter, drafted a certificate of money borrowed KRW 9 million around July 25, 2014, including additional obligations, etc. incurred while working as an employee.
B. The Plaintiff, while working in the Eda, engaged in sexual traffic according to the Defendants’ instructions and good offices.
C. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff received treatment with obstetric and eutic diseases from November 2014 due to the aftermathy as an employee of the Ediversary work, and received a mental therapy due to emeric and emeral symptoms, etc.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap 1 to 4 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Article 10 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. provides that a claim against a person who has engaged in an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. or a person who has employed a person who has engaged in an act of selling sex with respect to such act shall be null and void regardless of the form or title of the relevant contract. The illegal consideration stipulated in Article 746 of the Civil Act for the reason that the claim for return of unjust enrichment is prohibited refers to the case where the act of causing it is contrary to good morals and other social order. Since the act of inducing and coercing the act is contrary to good morals and other social order, money and valuables or other property gains provided as the means of inducing, soliciting and coercing sexual traffic, etc. while employing a person who has sexual intercourse, cannot be claimed as illegal consideration, and furthermore, the economic benefits that are paid or related to sexual traffic, as well as the economic benefits that have been provided directly as a consideration for sexual traffic, are excluded.