logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.06.20 2017고단3209
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 3209] On July 24, 2017, the Defendant driven CKaren vehicle with restricted speed exceeding 80 km/h on July 24, 2017.

[2017 Highest 3210] On August 7, 2017, the Defendant driven C car sirens in excess of the speed of 80 km/h on the Jeju-si Road around August 7, 2017.

[2017 Highest 3211] On August 24, 2017, the Defendant driven CKaren vehicle with a speed exceeding 80 km/h on the Jeju-si Road at around 11:30 on August 24, 2017.

[2017 Highest 3212] On July 29, 2017, the Defendant driven CKaren vehicle with a speed exceeding 80 km/h of 80km at around July 29, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An explanatory note for each control;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes with inspection results;

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 17 (3) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel provides that an act of misunderstanding that his act constitutes a crime pursuant to the law shall not be punishable only when there is a justifiable ground for misunderstanding. It does not merely mean a legal site, but it is generally a crime, but it is recognized that his act does not constitute a crime under the law, and if there is a justifiable ground for misunderstanding of misunderstanding of misunderstanding of misunderstanding of misunderstanding of the facts. (See Supreme Court Decision 9Do5026 delivered on June 29, 2001, etc.) according to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the instant case, it is legally permitted to pass beyond 13.8 km section of 13.8 km in publicity materials related to the regulation of the section of the Jeju National Police Agency. It is part of Jeju area.

arrow