logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.10.13 2020고단2868
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who operates sexual traffic establishments without trade name in the Seo-gu B second floor of Daejeon.

From January 28, 2020 to March 30 of the same month, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, by having four smuggling, one employee in charge of carbers and two females of commercial sex acts, and having them look at the place, receive KRW 1.20,00 won in return for the sexual sex acts from the male who found the place, and having the female sexual intercourses with the female sexual intercourses by having them do the sexual intercourses by having the female and male guests do the sexual intercourses in the smuggling room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the accused, C, D, E, F, and G;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports;

1. Application of the provisions of seizure records and seizure list statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order include the fact that the defendant has mistakenly recognized and reflected the defendant's mistake, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and result of the crime, and all the conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined

arrow