The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On May 13, 2013, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case: (a) around 20:40, the Defendant: (b) destroyed F’s standing signboards by setting up and operating a standing signboard in front of the D cafeteria operated by the Defendant at Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, in order for F to take clothes in the name of “E” from the above cafeteria to the name of “E” to be obstructed the Defendant’s business by setting up up up up up the standing signboards on the front side of the Defendant’s standing signboards immediately adjacent to the cafeteria, thereby hindering the Defendant’s business.

2. The defendant's assertion that F's standing signboards were not damaged.

3. As to whether the F’s standing signboard was damaged due to the instant case, considering the following circumstances, namely, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 300,00 on June 17, 2013 due to the criminal fact that the Defendant destroyed and damaged the F’s standing signboard on February 28, 2013, which could be recognized by a photograph of the damaged part, as to whether the F’s standing signboard was damaged, the photograph of the standing signboard submitted in the instant case and the photograph of the standing signboard submitted in the instant case are unclear as to whether it was additionally damaged due to the instant case, and there is no evidence to find that the F’s standing signboard was damaged by the instant case, based on the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

4. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the court acquitted the defendant under the latter part of Article 325