Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 High 951" is a member of the reserve forces.

On May 10, 2018, the Defendant received training from the Defendant’s house of Songpa-gu Seoul and 303 on May 10, 2018 (the second supplementary training conducted on May 29, 2018 at the training site of Gangnam-dong and Song-dong Reserve Forces (8 hours carried forward in May 29, 2017) (hereinafter “17”), and did not receive training without justifiable grounds, despite receiving a notice of convening a call for training under the name of the second unit commander of 6019 unit 2 of the Army to the effect that he/she would have

The defendant of "2018 High 967" is the member of the two reserve forces of the 6019 Army, the 2nd unit D of the 6019 Army.

1. On March 12, 2018, the Defendant received a notice of convening a training call to attend the second supplementary training (30H) conducted at the training site of Gangnam-dong and Song-dong reserve forces from March 26, 2018 to March 29, 2018.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without good cause, participated in the above training (22H) from March 27, 2018 to March 29, 2018.

2. On March 30, 2018, the Defendant received a notice of convening a drill to attend the second supplementary training (6H) conducted at the training site of the said reserve forces on March 30, 2018.

Nevertheless, the defendant was unable to participate in the above training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High 951"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The accusation "2018 High Court 967";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning each accusation and criminal facts;

1. Article 15 (9) 1 and Article 6 (1) of the Act, and Article 6 of the Act, the selection of fines for the crimes and the selection of punishment for each reserve force;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the public trial of this case, such as the fact that there are multiple records of criminal punishment for the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the frequency of violations, and the health status of the defendant, shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions indicated in the public trial of this case.