1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except in the following cases, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it is, by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

- The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff’s operating profit of more than the amount already invested while operating G from around 2010 without excluding the Defendants, and that the entire investment recovery amount was paid. In the instant agreement, the Plaintiff, after investing KRW 300 million in the Defendants, decided to return KRW 500 million from the Defendants until May 1, 2010. The Plaintiff failed to pay KRW 500 million to the Plaintiff by the agreed period, even if it invested more than KRW 300 million in G pursuant to the instant agreement until December 24, 2009. According to the agreement, the Plaintiff’s failure to pay KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff by the agreed period, and the Plaintiff’s failure to pay KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff for the purpose of using it for G Kim processing business. As such, the Plaintiff paid KRW 90,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from Q Q’s operating profit to receive KRW 500,01.