The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant of this part of the facts charged without taking appropriate measures after causing a traffic accident is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (one month of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, community service, 80 hours of compliance driving, and 40 hours of compliance driving) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged was around 08:29 on February 8, 2014, the Defendant, along with three lanes in front of the Malley-distance, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, along a vehicle with C optionsmari-distance, proceeded from the Seogn Negngm to about 60km in the speed of Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

Since there was an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the driver had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right of the driver and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in violation of the signal and received the part of the victim’s DNA driving, which was proceeding from the Korean National Police Agency’s four-distance distance to the direction of the sampling distance, in accordance with the National Police Agency’s four-distance line, in front of the options car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the victim D to suffer injury, such as salt panions, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, and caused the victim F, who was on board a car to suffer injury, such as salt panions, requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and escaped without any measure such as stopping and providing rescue to the victims.

B. The Defendant, who left the scene of the instant accident from the investigative agency to the court of the competent trial, and made a false statement on the criminal records after the instant accident, or made an impossible statement without being consistent with objective evidence.