Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who resides in B building 102, 101, 102, 101, and the victim C (35) is a person who resides in the same building B, 102, 201.
On December 9, 2015, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s thought that the noise between floors was caused by the upper floor of the victim’s residence. On December 9, 2015, the Defendant demanded that “I wish to see, or if I wish to see, directors, or directors, I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see. I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see.
Doing “,” etc., batd the victim’s bat and batd the victim’s bat at hand.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act);
B. After the instant indictment, the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish him/her ( September 7, 2016)
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);