1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 18, 2014, the Plaintiff issued to the Defendant a promissory note with a face value of KRW 30 million, the payee, the Defendant, the date of issuance, November 18, 2014, the date of payment, May 17, 2015, the place of payment, the place of payment, and the place of issuance, all of which are Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant promissory note”).

B. The Defendant, in the capacity of an issuer’s agent and an addressee, entrusted an attorney-at-law in charge of authentication with the preparation of a notarial deed on the Promissory Notes of this case to which a notary public belongs, submitted a power of attorney in charge of authentication of this case (hereinafter “instant power of attorney”) and a certificate of personal seal impression

◎ 수임인 : 피고 ◎ 위의 사람을 본인의 대리인으로 정하여 공증인가 법무법인 로직에서 공증인법 제56조의2(어음수표의 공증 등)에 의한 다음 어음의 금원지급을 연체할 경우에는 즉시 강제집행을 받아도 이의 없다는 취지 내용의 공정증서 작성 촉탁에 관한 일체의 권한을 위임합니다.

(자기계약 및 쌍방대리를 승낙함) ◎ 액면 : 삼천만원정 ◎ 발행일 : 2014. 11. 18. ◎ 발행인 : 원고 ◎ 지급기일 : 2015. 5. 17. ◎ 수취인 : 피고 ◎ 발행지, 지급지, 지급장소 : 서울특별시 ◎ 작성일자 : 2014. 11. 21. ◎ 위임인 : 원고

C. Accordingly, on November 21, 2014, the said law firm drafted a notarial deed of promissory notes No. 228 of the 2014, stating that “When delayed payment of the above amount, it shall be acknowledged that no objection is raised even if it is immediately enforced.” (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with respect to the Promissory Notes of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion issued the Promissory Notes, and then issued the Plaintiff’s seal imprint certificate and a certificate of seal impression to the Defendant at the Defendant’s request.

The defendant bears the plaintiff's seal imprint and the certificate of seal imprint.