A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has a weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, military register barriers, etc.

At around 16:40 on April 11, 2013, the Defendant entered 1,200 won of 1,200 won at the E store for the victim D's convenience in the operation of Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul by using the gap in which employees are placed, and entered 1,200 won of the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements and certificates of delivery of goods;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Article 10 (2) and (1) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On April 11, 2013, the summary of the facts charged (the theft of marina) stated food, etc. on the third floor food store located in the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Busan Special Metropolitan City, 316-2, 200, the Defendant stolen it by putting food, etc. on the third floor food store located in the Bupyeong-si Special Metropolitan City, 316-2, 200, and then putting it on a room that prepared food equivalent to 31,700 won at the market price, such as a biffyer owned by the victim who was put in the said bife, etc., and had prepared for food in advance.

2. The witness F’s legal statement, inquiry letter, CCTV photograph, etc. are admissible as evidence consistent with the facts charged in this part, and the witness F confirmed CCTV at the time of recovery of damaged goods in this court. According to the above, the witness F stated that the Defendant separated the shopping products and confirmed the CCTV page in which the remainder is put in a bank. However, the contents of the statement are ① immediately after the date and time stated in the facts charged, the Defendant moved a kart to outside of the gypt and thief at the convenience store in front of the gypt.

at the time of arrest.