logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.06.11 2019고단736
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle in the field B in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act.

On February 6, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.09% on blood alcohol level at 0.09% on February 12:25, 2019, driven the above car at 200 meters from the curgian to the curgical distance, and entered the right line to the left to the left of the left at the left of the left of the remaining part, with the road as the 1 cycle near the curgic circulation in the Purgian City from the curgic Doming-gu. D.

In such a case, the driver of the vehicle neglected to drive the vehicle while considering the driving situation of the vehicle driven at the front of the signal, etc. installed on the street, but neglected to do so, and caused the driver to shock the driver behind the vehicle in front of the defendant vehicle, and caused the driver to shock the driver in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle by the victim E (the age of 35) who was under the influence of the vehicle due to the red signal due to the negligence of driving the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the victim’s vehicle to be in excess of KRW 7,081,184 of repair cost.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a passenger car in the B SP paper.

Although the owner of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the defendant operated the motor vehicle without mandatory insurance at the date and place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, actual condition investigation reports, and the circumstantial statement of the driver concerned;

arrow