The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the record, the lower court is justifiable to have rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the mental and physical weakness on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of law as to the determination of mental and physical weakness.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below contains an error of law that deviates from the inherent limit of the sentencing due to a misunderstanding of facts as to the basic facts of the sentencing and a lack of deliberation as to the circumstances on which the sentencing conditions are attached.

Examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, motive and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the determination of the lower court’s punishment that maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced the Defendant to 15 years of imprisonment cannot be deemed as extremely unfair, even in light of the circumstances asserted on the ground of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.