logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.12 2015나48220
소유권확인
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "(A)" to "3. Judgment" at the end of the judgment of the court of first instance (A, according to the evidence Nos. 9 and 10, in light of the fact that the plaintiff's assertion is recognized as C's heir through T in the related lawsuit, and therefore, it cannot be accepted even more). Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the appeal by the plaintiff (pre-party) is dismissed.

arrow