A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 B의 형으로 2015. 7. 16. 12:37경 경북 울릉군 C에 있는 울릉경찰서 D파출소에 B이 E에 대한 업무방해 현행범인으로 체포되어 인치되자 파출소에 찾아가 출입문을 발로 차면서 D파출소장 경감 F에게 “내 동생 수갑 풀어라, 이 개새끼야, 모조리 죽여 버린다. 경찰관 짭새 너거들 가만두지 않는다. 징역살고 나와 너거들 죽여 버리겠다. 경찰 너거들 E이 한테 돈 받아 쳐 먹었제. 옷 다 벗기겠다.”라고 말하면서 발로 F 허벅지를 1회 차는 등 폭행ㆍ협박하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to criminal cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Attachment of work place; Attachment of E’s statement; E’s statement, etc.); service place attached thereto; and each police protocol of E;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 months of imprisonment or more or one year and four months of imprisonment) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] unfavorable circumstances: The defendant’s use of abusive and violence at a long-time police box to interfere with the performance of official duties: The defendant’s perception of all crimes and reflects the mistake; the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same type of criminal records or fine;