1. The Defendant: (a) each of the 8,000,000 won to Plaintiff A and B; (b) 40,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; and (c) each of the above amounts, on October 2, 2018.

1. In full view of the purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 as a whole, the defendant's conviction of the order of disclosure and notification of information for seven years, ten years, restriction on employment, 20 years, and 20 years of imprisonment with labor for the defendant's crime as stated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, and 4 against the plaintiff Eul (including Jeonju District Court Military Branch of 2019 Ma32, 64 (merger), etc.) was finalized, and the fact that the plaintiff Gap and Eul are the parents of the plaintiff C is recognized, and according to the above facts of recognition, it is clear in the empirical rule that the plaintiffs suffered severe mental distress due to the tort as stated in the defendant's separate sheet, so the defendant is liable for the plaintiffs' mental damage suffered by the plaintiffs

2. The scope of liability for damages is set at KRW 40 million for Plaintiff C and KRW 8 million for Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, respectively, in consideration of various circumstances shown in the pleadings, such as health bond, the content of the Defendant’s tort, the age and relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, the degree of criminal punishment against the Defendant, the degree of mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiffs, and the circumstances after the tort.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff C the amount of KRW 40 million, KRW 8 million, and each of the above amounts to the plaintiff C, as requested by the plaintiff, 5% per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act from October 2, 2018 to May 14, 2020, the sentencing date of this case, which is the date of the tort of this case, and 12% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit.