1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 112,525,680, and KRW 1,500,000 for each of the plaintiff B and C, and KRW 375,00 for each of them.

Plaintiff

A was an accident that knee part of knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn-kne-kn-kne-kn-kne-kn-kne-kn-kne-kn-kn-kne-kne-kne-kn-kn-kak-kn-kak-kn-kak-kn-kak-kn-kak-kn-kak-kn-kn-kn-kaker-kn-kak.

The plaintiff asserts that since the injury suffered by the plaintiff A due to the accident in this case constitutes 15% of the loss rate of labor force stipulated in the degree of loss of labor force in attached Table 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act, the defendant should pay 9,338,184 won of daily profit, and 3 million won of consolation money stipulated in Article 19 of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act, respectively.

In this regard, it is argued that the disability grade of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act, which applies mutatis mutandis, stipulates the degree of loss of labor force excessively compared to other statutes, and that the amount should be calculated on the basis of the loss rate of labor ability by 5%.

The School Safety Act prohibits school safety accidents and compensates participants in educational activities such as students promptly and appropriately for damages caused by school safety accidents.